searchify GitHub
Searchify

Which open model should your agent use?

We held tryouts. Same agent, same search, same tools, every model on Nebius Token Factory against Claude Opus 5.

Easy questions say: any of them.

On single facts every model scores 94 to 100%. Qwen3 30B ties Claude at 80× lower cost. Most teams would switch here.

In plain wordsOn simple facts almost every model scores close to 100%. Stop here and you would just pick the cheapest.

Right answers

DeepSeek V4 Flash
100%
Reflection Beam
100%
Nemotron 3 Super
100%
Nemotron 3 Ultra
100%
Claude Opus 5
100%
Qwen3 30B
98%
gpt-oss 120B
96%
Nemotron Lightning
96%

Cost per question

Claude Opus 5
$0.0338
Nemotron 3 Ultra
$0.0053
Nemotron 3 Super
$0.0014
Reflection Beam
$0.0013
DeepSeek V4 Flash
$0.0007
Nemotron Lightning
$0.0006
gpt-oss 120B
$0.0006
Qwen3 30B
$0.0004

50 verified facts in German and English. Every model answers from the same search results.

Hard questions say: not that one.

On research that chains 2 to 5 facts, Qwen3 30B drops from 98% to 50%, and 35% of its answers are confidently wrong. Claude: 88%.

In plain wordsWhen an answer needs several facts chained together, the cheap pick gets half of them wrong and sounds sure about it.

Right answers

Claude Opus 5
88%
Reflection Beam
80%
Nemotron 3 Super
77%
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
77%
DeepSeek V4 Flash
70%
Nemotron Lightning
65%
Nemotron 3 Ultra
57%
gpt-oss 120B
55%
Qwen3 30B
50%

Confidently wrong

DeepSeek V4 Flash
8%
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
8%
Claude Opus 5
12%
Reflection Beam
12%
Nemotron 3 Super
13%
Nemotron 3 Ultra
15%
Nemotron Lightning
20%
gpt-oss 120B
28%
Qwen3 30B
35%

40 FRAMES questions. Each model plans its own searches, up to three rounds, with the same 16k output budget. Nemotron Lightning runs with thinking on; with it off it scores 38%, see the NVIDIA section.

Two open models hold up.

Reflection Beam is right 80% of the time at 13× lower cost. DeepSeek V4 Flash: 70% at 30× lower cost, with the fewest wrong answers of any open model (8%).

In plain wordsTwo open models stay close to Claude for a small fraction of the price.

Cost per question

Claude Opus 5
$0.0619
Nemotron 3 Ultra
$0.0244
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
$0.0076
Nemotron 3 Super
$0.0054
Reflection Beam
$0.0047
Nemotron Lightning
$0.0028
DeepSeek V4 Flash
$0.0021
gpt-oss 120B
$0.0018
Qwen3 30B
$0.0009

Live Token Factory prices, every call priced by LiteLLM. Shorter is cheaper.

Nemotron on hard research.
Super: 77% at 11× lower cost.

Turning thinking on lifts Lightning from 38% to 65%. Super solves 12 of 14 tool tasks. Ultra's tool calls come back from Token Factory as raw text, so it solves none: a server setting, not the model.

Hard questions, right answers

Nemotron 3 Super
77%
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
77%
Lightning, thinking on
65%
Nemotron 3 Ultra
57%
Lightning, thinking off
38%

Tool tasks solved

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
14 of 14
Nemotron 3 Super
12 of 14
Nemotron Lightning
9 of 14
Nemotron 3 Ultra
0 of 14

Agents use tools. So we gave them real ones.

Every model drives the same MCP servers: Tavily, semble code search and a real Chrome for pages that need JavaScript. DeepSeek V4 Flash solves 14 of 14 at 51× lower cost. Claude solves 14.

In plain wordsThe AI decides by itself which tool to use: search, read a page, look at code, or open a real browser.

One of the 14 tasks: DeepSeek V4 Flash opens Chrome by itself and reads a page that only exists after JavaScript runs.

Tasks solved, out of 14

DeepSeek V4 Flash
14
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
14
Claude Opus 5
14
Reflection Beam
12
Nemotron 3 Super
12
Qwen3 30B
11
Nemotron Lightning
9
gpt-oss 120B
8
Nemotron 3 Ultra
0

14 tasks with answers checked against the source on 18 October 2026.

On our own logs, the best open model wins.

Questions written from the research our agents ran last month. DeepSeek V4 Flash is right 75% of the time, Claude 69%. What still trips every model: questions with a false premise.

In plain wordsThese are questions our own agents really researched last month. This is the test that matters for us.

Right answers

DeepSeek V4 Flash
75%
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
75%
Nemotron Lightning
69%
Reflection Beam
69%
Claude Opus 5
69%
Qwen3 30B
62%
Nemotron 3 Ultra
62%
gpt-oss 120B
56%
Nemotron 3 Super
56%

Confidently wrong

DeepSeek V4 Flash
19%
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
19%
Reflection Beam
19%
Claude Opus 5
19%
Nemotron Lightning
25%
Qwen3 30B
31%
Nemotron 3 Super
31%
Nemotron 3 Ultra
38%
gpt-oss 120B
44%

16 questions. Every answer is a quote checked against the page; some rest on a false premise, so the right answer is "unknown".

Watch one answer.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL in deep mode, on a real question from our logs: What is the name of the brewery featured at the Berlin community event on AI agents and physical AI that takes place on October 17, 2026 and does not require a GTC pass?

Search
Read
Pick
Answer
Check
Result
Berlin community event AI agents physical AI October 17 2026
Berlin AI agents physical AI event October 2026 no GTC pass required
Berlin AI agents physical AI October 17 2026 brewery
brewery featured Berlin community event AI agents physical AI October 17 2026 no GTC pass
16 new results · full pages read · 65 passages
baxtel.com
0.4
## Logistics Conference venue: STATION-Berlin, Luckenwalder Str. 4–6, 10963 Berlin Keynote: Tempodrom, Möckernstraße 10, 10963 Berlin (October 21, 2026) In-person event; the Je…
youtube.com
0.3
# NVIDIA GTC Berlin 2026: The Rise of the Super AI Factory ## Channel: Dinis Guarda (verified) 227K subscribers 0 likes ### Description 19 views Posted: 2026-10-15 I’m excited to …
redhat.com
0.1
In-person event # Red Hat at NVIDIA GTC Berlin 2026 October 21, 2026 - October 22, 2026 Berlin, GermanySTATION Berlin Share Event menu Event menu Event Menu Event Menu #…
instagram.com
-0.1
AI’s next big stage is Berlin. 🚀 From October 20–22, #NVIDIAGTC brings together some of the brightest minds in AI, robotics, engineering, and business to explore the technolog…
instagram.com
-0.9
AgentCon Berlin 2026 AgentCon Berlin 2026 is a community-driven conference focused on the future of AI agents and autonomous systems, taking place on May 19, 2026, 9:00 AM CET…
Missing a fact → new search
Berlin October 17 2026 AI agents physical AI community event brewery no GTC pass
GTC Berlin side event October 17 2026 brewery AI agents physical AI
"October 17, 2026" Berlin AI agents physical AI brewery event
8 new results · full pages read · 116 passages
ai.berlin
5.5
Skip to main navigation Skip to page footer ai.berlin logo ai.berlin logo Back Build-A-Claw: Berlin #### Community event on AI agents, open models, and physical AI with demo…
luma.com
4.3
​This is a community event for builders at every level. Whether you’re just discovering what agents can do or already running them in production, there’s something here for you. ​…
ai.berlin
4.0
[Skip to main navigation](#mainnavigation) [Skip to page footer](#page-footer) [![ai.berlin logo](/fileadmin/assets/ai.berlin_Logo.svg) ![ai.berlin logo](/fileadmin/assets/ai.ber…
luma.com
1.8
​This is a community event for builders at every level. Whether you’re just discovering what agents can do or already running them in production, there’s something here for you. ​*…
ai.berlin
1.8
The program includes hands-on demos with autonomous agents, physical AI, and open models running on NVIDIA hardware such as **DGX Spark and DGX Station**, alongside technical talks…
“🍻 **From agents to ale:** Stick around for the OpenClaw Brewery story with Gerhard Erschwendner of Lobster Lager, followed by the raffle and Agent Challenge winners. Enjoy food, drinks, and plenty of time to meet fellow ”
1 of 1 quotes found word for word in the sources
✓ verified
OpenClaw Brewery
Right
Verified answer: OpenClaw Brewery · 2 rounds · 55 s · less than a cent

Then we fixed what we could.

Same questions from our logs, same models. Full pages instead of snippets, the best passages picked by Searchify's reranker, one search per fact, and an answer only with quotes that are really in the sources. It lifts the strong models, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL to 75–94% across two machines, and trips up the small ones.

In plain wordsReading whole pages, keeping only the best passages and checking every quote helps the big models. The small ones get confused by the extra rules.

beforedeep mode

Right answers

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
75%+19
DeepSeek V4 Flash
75%±0
Claude Opus 5
69%+6
Nemotron Lightning
69%-7
Nemotron 3 Super
56%+6
Reflection Beam
69%-7
Nemotron 3 Ultra
62%±0
Qwen3 30B
62%-15
gpt-oss 120B
56%-12

Confidently wrong

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
19%-13
DeepSeek V4 Flash
19%-7
Claude Opus 5
19%-7
Nemotron Lightning
25%±0
Nemotron 3 Super
31%-6
Reflection Beam
19%+6
Nemotron 3 Ultra
38%-13
Qwen3 30B
31%+16
gpt-oss 120B
44%+6

16 questions, so read these as direction, not decimals. A second machine (Sami's laptop) got 75% for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL where ours got 94%: 3 answers flipped. Reranker: cross-encoder/mmarco-mMiniLMv2-L12-H384-v1, top 12 passages. Every setting is stored with each result, see REPRODUCE.md.

Run it twice.

Same questions, same prompts, a second time. Qwen3 30B goes from 49% to 41%: 9 of 39 answers flip. One run is not a decision.

In plain wordsAsk the same thing twice and cheap models can change their answer. Test twice before you trust a winner.

Reflection Beam

First run
82%
Second run
79%

Nemotron 3 Super

First run
77%
Second run
62%

Qwen3 30B

First run
49%
Second run
41%

Why they miss.

We rebuilt exactly what every model read. When the cheap models are wrong on hard questions, the answer was usually not in anything they found, and they answered anyway instead of searching again.

  • Our own plumbing first. Rate-limited searches came back empty and made some models search blind. Fixed and rerun; check yours too.
  • They stop too early. One search round, then a confident guess.
  • They don't say "I don't know". On false-premise questions they make up an answer.
  • Settings hurt them. Thinking turned off, output cut off, a tool parser set wrong on the server.

How we make them better.

  • Free: fix the settings. Thinking on, longer output, the right tool parser for Nemotron Ultra.
  • Runtime: answer only with a quoted sentence, otherwise search again or say "unknown".
  • Swap: Tongyi DeepResearch, the same Qwen3 30B base trained for research. Its makers report 90.6 on FRAMES.
  • Train: LoRA on Qwen3 30B on Token Factory, from our own verified research logs, with Tryouts as the test.

Training data comes from open models and checked answers only. Every step is measured with the same tryouts, before and after.

So which one?

  • Tool-heavy agents: DeepSeek V4 Flash.
  • Multi-hop research: Reflection Beam.
  • Single facts: Qwen3 30B.
  • Questions like our logs: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL in deep mode, DeepSeek V4 Flash without it.
  • Lowest cost that still holds up: Nemotron Lightning, thinking on.

That's our workload. Yours will be different, which is why you should run your own tryouts.

Two editions. Pick one.

Searchify runs on its own, with no key. Searchify for Tavily lets Tavily search and read the web with your key, while Searchify ranks every passage on your machine and takes over any call where Tavily is slow.

In plain wordsTavily brings the reach, Searchify picks the best sentences. Together they answer more questions than Searchify alone.

No key
Searchify
  • Searches the web itself
  • Reads pages itself, including JavaScript pages
  • Ranks passages on your machine
Your Tavily key
Searchify for Tavily
  • Tavily searches the web
  • Tavily reads the pages; Searchify reads what Tavily can't
  • Searchify ranks passages on your machine
  • Tavily slower than 3 s? Searchify takes over that call

Answer in the top 5 passages

Searchify
62%
Searchify for Tavily
80%

Search and reading, seconds per question (median)

Searchify
2.8 s
Searchify for Tavily
4.2 s

Came back with nothing

Searchify
36%
Searchify for Tavily
16%

50 single-fact questions with checked answers, 18 October 2026, one question at a time. No model involved: this measures what reaches the model. Ranking runs on the same machine in both editions, so it is left out of the times. Searchify took over from Tavily on 16 of 50 questions.

Set it up your way.

Plugin, slash command, skill, MCP server, command line, or your own open models. Every way comes in both editions.

Searchify, keyless

/plugin marketplace add Malek1414/tryouts
/plugin install searchify@searchify

Searchify for Tavily

export TAVILY_API_KEY=tvly-... # your key, in the shell that starts Claude Code
/plugin install searchify-tavily@searchify

Searchify, keyless

/searchify:research How much memory does the DGX Spark have?

Searchify for Tavily

/searchify-tavily:research How much memory does the DGX Spark have?

Searchify, keyless

npx skills add Malek1414/tryouts --skill searchify

Searchify for Tavily

npx skills add Malek1414/tryouts --skill searchify-tavily

Searchify, keyless

claude mcp add searchify -e SEARCHIFY_MODE=local -- uvx --from "searchify[mcp,rerank] @ git+https://github.com/Malek1414/tryouts#subdirectory=searchify-tavily-edition" searchify-mcp

Searchify for Tavily

claude mcp add searchify-tavily -e TAVILY_API_KEY=$TAVILY_API_KEY -- uvx --from "searchify[mcp,rerank] @ git+https://github.com/Malek1414/tryouts#subdirectory=searchify-tavily-edition" searchify-mcp

Searchify, keyless

uv tool install "searchify[mcp,rerank] @ git+https://github.com/Malek1414/tryouts#subdirectory=searchify-tavily-edition"
SEARCHIFY_MODE=local searchify research "your question"

Searchify for Tavily

searchify research "your question" # with TAVILY_API_KEY set

Any model you run (Ollama, LM Studio, llama.cpp, vLLM)

searchify chat --preset ollama:qwen3
searchify chat --base-url http://localhost:1234/v1 --model qwen/qwen3-4b
searchify models # every model we tested, as a preset

The models we tested, on Nebius Token Factory

export NEBIUS_API_KEY=...
searchify ask "your question" --preset deepseek-v4-flash
searchify chat --preset nemotron-3.5-super-vl

Open WebUI hosts any of these models as a chatbot

uvx mcpo --port 8000 -- searchify-mcp
# then in Open WebUI: Settings, Tools, add http://localhost:8000

LM Studio, Jan, Continue, Cline, Goose

{ "mcpServers": { "searchify": { "command": "searchify-mcp", "env": { "SEARCHIFY_MODE": "local" } } } }

Full guide with every app: docs/use-with-any-model.md in the repo.

See it work.

How Sami got into NVIDIA GTC, and how close Nemotron 3.5 Super VL gets when it redoes the research. Read the full story
"Get me a ticket to the Emmys", researched by Claude with Searchify for Tavily. See the run
Prompt by Daniel
The whole story in about a minute
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL notices a missing fact and searches again
It spots a question with a false premise and proves it
DeepSeek V4 Flash opens a browser by itself

Run it on your logs.

Get it on GitHub Browse every question and every answer, model by model Every question and every run on Hugging Face

1 Turn your agent's logs into questions with checked answers.

python scripts/build_hard_set.py --runs your-runs/ --out data/mine.jsonl

2 Hold the tryouts: python -m tryouts.run --eval data/mine.jsonl --mode agentic

Models served by Nebius Token Factory. Search by Tavily. Sami and Malek, Berlin, 18 October 2026.